You can purchase an autographed copy of Anything But Straight by sending a $35 check or money order to:
-------------------------
Wayne Besen
PO Box 25491
Brooklyn, NY 11202
Who can blame John McCain and Sarah Palin for saying that Barack Obama is "palling around with terrorists?" The GOP ticket is bombing so badly that they must blow up the race to have a shot at winning. Palin, about as subtle as a moose in an igloo, telegraphed the pugnacious plan of smearing Obama by sneering that they will "take the gloves off."
But, even in their attacks, the McCain campaign is a mumble jumble of mixed messages. On one hand, they tried to portray Obama as a closeted Muslim by having Lee County Florida Sheriff, Mike Scott, call the Democratic candidate "Barack Hussein Obama." However, Sarah Palin quickly reminded voters of Obama’s former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright. This might leave voters who are just tuning into the race wondering why this supposed Muslim spent so much time in church.
The truth is, the McCain/Palin experiment is a dud. He's looking too old and she's looking too new. McCain has gone from a man of stature to just plain stodgy, while Palin has been reduced from fresh to freshman. She needs more seasoning, while he's stayed at least one season too many. He appears long in the tooth, while she can't help baring her fangs.
Palin's nasty one-liners aren't resonating at a time when peoples’ bank accounts are flat lining. Cutthroat politics don't work as well when people are cutting back on gas and groceries. In a time of grave economic harm, one needs more than folksy charm. Sure, Palin can wink, but people want to know if she can think.
With Barrack Obama and Joe Biden emerging as the adults in the race, they are beginning to pull away. The McCain campaign suspended its operations in Michigan, and a Washington Post/ABC-News poll has Obama/Biden up seven points in Ohio.
A month is forever in a campaign and things can go sour quickly. Still, unless, there is a game-changer, like a YouTube video of Obama having tea in a cave with Osama, it looks like the Democrats will take the White House. Leaders of the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community, have to begin thinking about what this will mean. What should our community's expectations be? Will this be a huge step forward or a series of disappointments?
What I fear is that the enormity of our nation's problems makes it easier for Congress and an Obama administration to put GLBT equality on the backburner. They can even complicate our efforts by portraying us as self-serving at a time of economic crisis and war.
Now, I'm not suggesting that the new president should make gay issues his top priority at the Inauguration. Of course, this would actually backfire and cause a great deal of resentment from people who are worried about feeding their families. However, shouldn't we expect Congress to pass a law prohibiting job discrimination in the first six months? Or, hate crime legislation to reach Obama's desk within the first year? Will Don't Ask/Don't Tell be overturned by Congress or will Democrats postpone action, afraid of consequences in the midterm elections?
As far as I'm concerned, the Democrats need to take action sooner, rather than later. Since Newt Gingrich came to power in 1994, the Democrats have credibly been able to blame the Republicans for thwarting pro-gay legislation. If they finally have a Congressional majority and the presidency, however, they can no longer hide behind the big, bad ogres of the GOP. If the Democratic leaders make excuses for ignoring our concerns for an extended period of time, widespread disillusionment of GLBT Democrats may occur.
I also worry that some of our best and brightest leaders are too close to the Obama campaign. On one hand, this may serve us well, as they will have voice in the administration. But, as we know, it is always more difficult to criticize friends. Those who end up serving Obama must not end up like democratic versions of the Log Cabin Republicans, essentially serving as party apologists. They should put the well being of the community ahead of their careers.
If the insiders do not have the willingness or the leverage to move the Democrats, I predict the growth of outsider political groups who will turn to direct action to push Congress and the Administration. Sometimes, it takes grassroots organizations that do not have conflicts of interest (such as friendships with the establishment) to propel the movement forward.
Even as we fight on towards Election Day, we should take a deep breath and imagine the possibilities, while managing our expectations. While Obama is not the Messiah and we should not count on miracles, we should expect at least a few campaign promises to come to fruition.
8 Comments:
Wayne, I agree with the sentiment of your comments but I prefer to be more positive on the future for GLBT issues under an Obama Administration. The economy is, as you mention, first priority and the Bush Administration has left his predecessor with HUGE financial and security issues. However, we know Obama is a whiz at multi-tasking and I agree that passing a job discrimination bill within the first year is a reasonable target. As a Vietnam vet I certainly want to see DADT changed to allow brave men and women to honorably serve without fear of our government and military. I do believe this isse will be addressed, and if Obama can tie national security and the discharge of gay interpreters needed to keep our country safe, that Obama will accomplish this. I will support Obama no matter what, and I hope we will all give him time to address the multitude of issues left by Bush along with the great plans he has job creations, energy and the like. I enjoy your commentaries!
posted by TexasCowboy, at
10/07/2008 6:55 PM
I hope you are right. I support Obama as well. Let's hope the deabate goes well tonight
posted by Wayne Besen, at
10/07/2008 7:06 PM
Not so fast, Wayne. Let's not count the chicks before they hatch. It is at these times that we all get cocky and self-assured and ultimately get sloppy. This thing is not a sure thing with 30 days or so to go until the election. We need to be out there ensuring Obama's election and not giving up that fight until November 4.
posted by richard schillen, at
10/08/2008 7:40 AM
Richard:
We can do both. We can fight to have him elected, but on the drive to the volunteer station, we can reflect for a moment on what life will be like once he is in the White House and what we can expect.
posted by Wayne Besen, at
10/08/2008 9:54 AM
Lets get him elected first and foremost. Personally, I don't much care for his health care plan or McCain's for that matter....we still won't have coverage for all of the 47 million without any access to decent health care, nor do I agree with his civil union plan at the federal level. He admits health care is a right, McCain does not, but he's going to have to do a lot better on covering those who won't be covered under his or McCain's plan.
posted by Anonymous, at
10/08/2008 10:02 AM
At the very minimum, if Obama is elected, gays and lesbians would at least have a president in the White House who wouldn't attack us. At best, he would help us repeal the military ban, etc., but I seriously doubt that the Democrats have the spine to do so.
posted by Chris L., at
10/08/2008 10:20 AM
Dennis Kucinich had a brilliant plan to expand medicare for all, redefining and improving it with not that much cost to the tax payer. I don't know what it is in the American psyche that makes it so averse to any program that smacks of "socialized" programs. Medicare is one, so are medicaid, the police department, fire department, public libraries, public school systems, the military even. Can you imagine if all these programs were privatized? We'd end up with a never ending cycle of situations such as AIG, Lehman Brothers, Enron and the corruption of health insurance and pharmaceutical lobbyists who have no scruples when it comes to making a fast buck at our expense. I just don't get. Every major western industrialized society has socialized medicine, among others that work very well. Yes, they all have their problems, but don't buy into the fear mongering of the right wing and neocons that you have to wait years for surgery. What they are not telling you is that elective surgery is the one area where you wait a few months, NOT years. I've lived in Europe, ergo, England, France and Germany...I received outstanding care and service,nobody asked me to produce an insurance card or how I was going to pay for services either. My wait time on average to make an appointment to see a doctor was no more than a week and my actual wait time in any doctor's office was no more than half an hour, about the same as it is with private health care in the U.S. Emergency care situations are handled the same way as they are in the U.S., immediately. I often ask neocons if they lost everything they owned, jobs, homes, possessions, wealth, health insurance, how would they access health care for themselves and their families? NOT ONE could give me any logical answer but dismissed it as purely hyperthetical, can you imagine...with what's been happening over the past couple of weeks and this Wall Street bail out?
posted by Anonymous, at
10/08/2008 1:35 PM
